World Net Daily did an article a while back about Barack Obama’s birth certificate claiming it was not acceptable in Hawaii and linked to several articles. One article they linked to Born Identity [link no longer available see Obama's birth certificate is still in question] by the Star Tribune of Honolulu stated Obama could only provide an electronic birth certificate because they disposed of all original paper copies. They only have electronic copies, so this link WND provides disproves their own article.
Another link WND provided was to the Hawaiian Homelands Program, which provides land to people who are 50% Hawaiian or more. You have to provider genealogy a few generations back to show your blood line is 50% Hawaiian or more. What this means is the link does not prove an electronic birth certificate in Hawaii is invalid, it proves one birth certificate is not sufficient to establish genealogy, which an original birth certificate would not necessarily provide either.
Why are people running with this birth certificate issue. If it were true it would mean Obama is not qualified to be President, but it doesn’t mean he’s a bad person. It doesn’t mean he’s capable of murder or supporting murder on a grand scale.
There are really bad things about Obama, but unfortunately that is not who the political pundits tell Republicans to complain about. Most issues Republicans publicize are issues Democrats would never care about, or will defend. They are positions Democrats actually like
I have written before about Barack Obama’s connections to Business International Corporation. This is what should really conern people about Barack Obama. Wikipedia now has an entry on Business International Corporation, which includes mention of Barack Obama’s internship. Wikipedia is not known as a reliable source of information, but you can double check the information they provide by clicking at the reference links at the bottom of the page, just as I clicked on the reference links in the WND article. In this case the person who edited Wikipedia article left out a couple of important reference links: the original article from the NYT and the article from Lobster Magazine based out of the UK. I provided these links in my first post Is Obama an Economic Hit Man?
What does it mean if Obama worked for a front operation for the CIA? After all, what’s so bad about the CIA? For examples I would recommend watching Secrets of the CIA. This program aired in the UK on Rupert Murdoch’s Sky One. It appears someone in the UK recorded the program on their TV and then posted it on Google Video, including all of Sky’s commercials:
More Reasons to be Concerned:
- Obama’s vote for the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005
- Obama’s vote for the FISA Amendments Act of 2008
- Obama has maintained George W. Bush’s state secrets policy, blocking a lawsuit by a man named Binyam Mohamed. The UK Telegraph reported Mohamed claims his genitals were sliced with a scalpel.
The 25 lines edited out of the court papers contained details of how Mr Mohamed’s genitals were sliced with a scalpel and other torture methods so extreme that waterboarding, the controversial technique of simulated drowning, “is very far down the list of things they did,” the official said.
- Obama appointed William Lynn, to serve as Deputy Secretary of Defense, former top lobbyist for defense contractor Raytheon.
- Obama appointed Eric Holder as Attorney General despite the fact he got Chiquita brands off the hook for hiring fascists in Columbia to kill labor activists.
- Obama appointed Timothy Geithner as Treasury Secretary although he was one of three people to organize the bailout of AIG, was President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and the list goes on.
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Recent Comments